|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR.
Exodus.
18
   |
Posted - 2014.04.08 13:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why does the Cynabal deserve yet another nerf? This is getting ridiculous. The Cynabal is in balance as it stands today. That is the one faction cruiser that you could have left as is. And the vigilant, finally gets the range bonus but along with it gets a power grid nerf?? Frig Online is getting terribly boring. It's changes like this that are actually making eve LESS balanced. Any ship that had the ability to fight outnumbered solo gets the big nerf bat and it's getting really tiring. (See: tengu, talos, cane, cynabal, dramiel, machariel, etc etc). In the interest of being constructive, instead of nerfing ships that are in balance to a point where nobody will fly them, bring other ships INTO balance. Find me one person who says the Cynabal as it is today needs a nerf? These are expensive ships that SHOULD be stronger than their T1 counterparts. |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR.
Exodus.
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
So I like that you reduced the nerf to the cynabal's powergrid, but I'm curious why there is still a nerf to powergrid at all? For artillery as it is I already require an ACR. Having to add a 2nd ACR would really make the arty cynabal even weaker than it already is. I'm having trouble seeing what it is you are trying to accomplish here. You're adding warp speed, but reducing the scan resolution and overall fitting, so it's kind of conflicting ideas on whether or not it's to be a cruiser/interceptor hybrid.... I like the idea of having a fast assault cruiser that does mediocre dps, but there is no tank if you take away pwg. as it stands right now my arty cynabal has 1 acr, and can only fit 1 lse with the medium neut. That's about 20k ehp, and does not need to be nerfed as that's already pretty week. There are assault frigs that are around 13k ehp. The cap life is already not very good after previous nerfs, and now a ship that's strength is supposed to be warping around like a frig is getting yet another nerf to cap regeneration, scan res, and tank.
TL;DR If you're going to mess with the cynabal, do it right... make your mind up on what this ship is supposed to be and quit making me change my fits if we're just going to go around in circles and not accomplish anything here.
EDIT: It's ok to just leave it alone all together. Nobody would be mad at you. Actually it appears from 95% percent of the posters here we'd rather you just leave it alone to begin with. |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR.
Exodus.
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Vadeim Rizen wrote:
EDIT: It's ok to just leave it alone all together. Nobody would be mad at you. Actually it appears from 95% percent of the posters here we'd rather you just leave it alone to begin with.
but it's awful
It's better than it would be with his proposed changes. |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR.
Exodus.
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:There's a reason the cargo holds don't usually make it into the OP but it isn't a good one. I'll try to work on that in the future. I'm going to change the cargo for the cruisers to the following numbers:
Ashimmu: 430
Cynabal: 400
Gila: 440
Phantasm: 410
Vigilant: 450
Look for the battleship post at the start of next week.
So of all the posts in regards to the combat ability and urging you to make certain changes or explain why you are making certain changes, the one you respond to is about cargohold? Glad you took the time to create a forum post about the changes to these cruisers so you can pretend to care what anyone thinks or has to say about them. |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR.
Exodus.
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Vadeim Rizen wrote:CCP Rise wrote:There's a reason the cargo holds don't usually make it into the OP but it isn't a good one. I'll try to work on that in the future. I'm going to change the cargo for the cruisers to the following numbers:
Ashimmu: 430
Cynabal: 400
Gila: 440
Phantasm: 410
Vigilant: 450
Look for the battleship post at the start of next week. So of all the posts in regards to the combat ability and urging you to make certain changes or explain why you are making certain changes, the one you respond to is about cargohold? Glad you took the time to create a forum post about the changes to these cruisers so you can pretend to care what anyone thinks or has to say about them. Another one of those snipy insulting posts directed at the person making the changes. Yea, that will get him to change course! if only people in real life could train social skills like we can in game, the world would be a better place.
What do you suggest, then? Not only have I posted several thought out, constructive criticism... as have many other people in this thread, and it gets no answer. Things like how the changes really arent beneficial to the actual application of the ship. Not just on the Vigi/Cynabal which I personally have problems with, but other people's concerns about the other ships as well... they just get ignored. Then someone brings up cargohold and it gets an immediate response. |
|
|
| |
|